feat: send value in the simulator ui transactions

[kstroobants]

Fixes #1026

What

• Added a new feature to send a value in the simulator UI transactions.
• Introduced a new value property in the ContractMethodItem.vue to handle transaction values.
• Updated the callWriteMethod function to include the value parameter.
• Modified the useContractQueries hook to accept and process the value parameter.

Why

• To enhance the simulator UI by allowing users to specify a transaction value.

Testing done

• Tested the new feature by simulating transactions with different values to ensure they are processed correctly.
• Verified that the UI updates correctly when the value is changed. No negative values can be written.
• This PR is for the frontend so the transaction is executed in the backend. The docker logs give the following when setting a value different than 0:

hardhat-1             |   Sender doesn't have enough funds to send tx. The max upfront cost is: 8 and the sender's balance is: 0.
jsonrpc-1             | [CONSENSUS_SERVICE]: Error forwarding transaction: {'code': -32000, 'message': "Sender doesn't have enough funds to send tx. The max upfront cost is: 8 and the sender's balance is: 0.", 'data': {'message': "Sender doesn't have enough funds to send tx. The max upfront cost is: 8 and the sender's balance is: 0.", 'data': None}}

Decisions made

• Decided to use useInputMap for managing value input to maintain consistency and reusability across the application.

Checks

• I have tested this code
• I have reviewed my own PR
• I have created an issue for this PR
• I have set a descriptive PR title compliant with conventional commits

Reviewing tips

• Focus on the integration of the value parameter in the UI.
• Ensure that the value is correctly handled and validated in the ContractMethodItem.vue.

User facing release notes

• Users can now specify a transaction value in the simulator UI.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 22 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 16.77%. Comparing base (df85917) to head (0149a03).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...nd/src/components/Simulator/ContractMethodItem.vue	0.00%	19 Missing ⚠️
frontend/src/hooks/useContractQueries.ts	0.00%	3 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1027      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   16.80%   16.77%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         127      127              
  Lines       10119    10139      +20     
  Branches      253      253              
==========================================
  Hits         1701     1701              
- Misses       8333     8353      +20     
  Partials       85       85              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
0.0% Coverage on New Code (required ≥ 80%)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud