Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature statuses for EDOT Node.js #121

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Mar 21, 2025
Merged

Feature statuses for EDOT Node.js #121

Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
8536951
Feature statuses for EDOT Node.js
trentm Mar 20, 2025
86ada3d
regenerate docs from features.yml changes
trentm Mar 20, 2025
ccbc3f0
Update docs/_edot-sdks/features.yml
AlexanderWert Mar 21, 2025
c88be15
Update docs/_edot-sdks/features.yml
AlexanderWert Mar 21, 2025
1851024
Update docs/_edot-sdks/features.yml
AlexanderWert Mar 21, 2025
b43b111
Update docs/_edot-sdks/features.yml
AlexanderWert Mar 21, 2025
d899073
re-generate table
AlexanderWert Mar 21, 2025
caded76
change to retrigger PR checks
AlexanderWert Mar 21, 2025
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
24 changes: 12 additions & 12 deletions docs/_edot-sdks/features.yml
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ features:
min_version: 1.0
Node.js:
status: ga
min_version: 1.0
min_version: "0.2.0"
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

review note: I'm fine moving this back to 1.0 if the aesthetics are better in the table. No one is ever going to use old version 0.2.0.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, let's move it back to 1.0 (I think we can ignore the pre-GA versions in this table)

PHP:
status: ga
min_version: 1.0
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -59,8 +59,8 @@ features:
status:
min_version:
Node.js:
status:
min_version:
status: ga
min_version:
PHP:
status:
min_version:
Expand All @@ -84,8 +84,8 @@ features:
status:
min_version:
Node.js:
status:
min_version:
status: ga
min_version:
PHP:
status:
min_version:
Expand All @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ features:
status:
min_version:
Node.js:
status:
status: ga
min_version:
PHP:
status:
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -158,8 +158,8 @@ features:
status: ga
min_version:
Node.js:
status: ga
min_version:
status: tech-preview
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

review note: The Logs API, Logs SDK, and instrumentations of logging libraries are still experimental in upstream OTel JS, so I was hesitant to call this "GA" in EDOT Node.js. Same for the log correlation below.

min_version:
PHP:
status: ga
min_version:
Expand All @@ -183,8 +183,8 @@ features:
status: ga
min_version:
Node.js:
status: ga
min_version:
status: tech-preview
min_version:
PHP:
status: ga
min_version:
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -282,8 +282,8 @@ features:
status:
min_version:
Node.js:
status:
min_version:
status: tech-preview
min_version:
PHP:
status:
min_version:
Expand Down
Loading