Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

suit: Do not erase on IPUC write setup #21056

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 20, 2025

Conversation

ahasztag
Copy link
Contributor

Erasing of the IPUC took about 500ms of time, which led to many issues.

The erasing was removed, instead different security measures were introduced, erasing parts when the
seek offset is greater than the write peek offset.

@ahasztag ahasztag requested a review from a team as a code owner March 20, 2025 09:10
@github-actions github-actions bot added the changelog-entry-required Update changelog before merge. Remove label if entry is not needed or already added. label Mar 20, 2025
@NordicBuilder
Copy link
Contributor

NordicBuilder commented Mar 20, 2025

CI Information

To view the history of this post, clich the 'edited' button above
Build number: 6

Inputs:

Sources:

sdk-nrf: PR head: b2a897a5f969444968bd4d89a5b2cb45327a35f9

more details

sdk-nrf:

PR head: b2a897a5f969444968bd4d89a5b2cb45327a35f9
merge base: 634e1bba37b5bf4b438dd1a243ac43aca1593217
target head (main): 73c22404b5f96682749c379881cddb473eb84978
Diff

Github labels

Enabled Name Description
ci-disabled Disable the ci execution
ci-all-test Run all of ci, no test spec filtering will be done
ci-force-downstream Force execution of downstream even if twister fails
ci-run-twister Force run twister
ci-run-zephyr-twister Force run zephyr twister
List of changed files detected by CI (1)
subsys
│  ├── suit
│  │  ├── ipuc
│  │  │  ├── src
│  │  │  │  │ suit_ipuc_sdfw.c

Outputs:

Toolchain

Version: 4ffa2202d5
Build docker image: docker-dtr.nordicsemi.no/sw-production/ncs-build:4ffa2202d5_e579f9fbe6

Test Spec & Results: ✅ Success; ❌ Failure; 🟠 Queued; 🟡 Progress; ◻️ Skipped; ⚠️ Quarantine

  • ◻️ Toolchain - Skipped: existing toolchain is used
  • ✅ Build twister
    • sdk-nrf test count: 112
  • 🟡 Integration tests
    • ✅ test-sdk-dfu
Disabled integration tests
    • desktop52_verification
    • doc-internal
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-apps
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-ble_mesh
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-ble_samples
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-boot
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-chip
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-fem
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-nfc
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_cloud
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_libmodem-nrf
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_mosh
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_positioning
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_samples
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_serial_lte_modem
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_thingy91
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_zephyr_lwm2m
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf_crypto
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-proprietary_esb
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-ps
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-rpc
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-rs
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-tfm
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-thread
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-zigbee
    • test-low-level
    • test-sdk-audio
    • test-sdk-find-my
    • test-sdk-mcuboot
    • test-sdk-pmic-samples
    • test-sdk-wifi
    • test-secdom-samples-public

Note: This message is automatically posted and updated by the CI

@ahasztag ahasztag force-pushed the NCSDK-32433_no_erase_on_ipuc_setup branch 4 times, most recently from 5cd42f1 to d0c0028 Compare March 20, 2025 11:44
@ahasztag ahasztag force-pushed the NCSDK-32433_no_erase_on_ipuc_setup branch from d0c0028 to b2a897a Compare March 20, 2025 13:20
Erasing of the IPUC took about 500ms of time, which
led to many issues.

The erasing was removed, instead different security
measures were introduced, erasing parts when the
seek offset is greater than the write peek offset.

Signed-off-by: Artur Hadasz <artur.hadasz@nordicsemi.no>
@ahasztag ahasztag force-pushed the NCSDK-32433_no_erase_on_ipuc_setup branch from b2a897a to f377b05 Compare March 20, 2025 13:25
@tomchy tomchy merged commit 0f6ada8 into nrfconnect:main Mar 20, 2025
13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
changelog-entry-required Update changelog before merge. Remove label if entry is not needed or already added.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants