-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Recipe doc #40
Recipe doc #40
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi Jirko,
good job on the documentation!
Firstly, when it comes to the content, I believe it has everything it needs to, and it is more or less understandable. However, I believe, to fully understand it, it needs to be backed up by examples, which could be a nice thing for somebody to focus on next.
Secondly, I found some things that could use some polishing, so check them out, when you have time, and I am happy to discuss any of them.
Again, great job!
doc/101.rst
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This file will need to be updated in the future, as it consists of outdated elements. However, as it is not the subject of this PR, I will not jump into them.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, that's true. However, could you please be more specific about the outdated elements (do you mean XML elements, or elements in a broader meaning)? It might deserve to elaborate a bit and create a GH issue to cover this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Firstly, the problem was once again with the viewer I used, it complained about the .rst elements, however they work fine on the intended platform.
Secondly, I did not check the XML elements or the content of this file, it should definitely be done in the future and updated if needed :)
@You-never-know Dane, thank you again for all your input and suggestions to improve the recipe documentation. I have addressed all of your findings, hope it will be mostly OK now :). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @jikortus, thank you for the update of the documentation. I am satisfied with the changes and I approve the documentation.
I am not sure whether the external variables support commits should be part of this PR. The changes look good to me, but I suggest a review by Honza as he has more knowledge about this functionality, if you want to keep it a part of this PR.
Thanks @You-never-know! Indeed the three commits shouldn't be included, I took care of that. |
@jikortus Great, I believe we can merge these changes, so that's everything from my side. We just need someone with write access to approve it as well. |
- document all existing elements and how to use them - some smallish fixes to existing documentation - add autosectionlabel extension to Sphinx configuration to enable better crossreferences. - add config file for readthedocs.io.
Review done and issues fixed; previous commits have been squashed - @jstodola, can you please merge the changes? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you!
Documentation for anabot recipes.