Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: Fix call didn't revert at a lower depth than cheatcode call depth forge error in EVM tests #591

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 22, 2025
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
3 changes: 3 additions & 0 deletions evm/test/TrimmedAmount.t.sol
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ contract TrimmingTest is Test {
}
}

/// forge-config: default.allow_internal_expect_revert = true
function testAddOperatorDecimalsNotEqualRevert() public {
uint8 decimals = 18;
uint8 decimalsOther = 3;
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -134,6 +135,7 @@ contract TrimmingTest is Test {
}
}

/// forge-config: default.allow_internal_expect_revert = true
function testSubOperatorOverflow() public {
uint8[2] memory decimals = [18, 3];

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -263,6 +265,7 @@ contract TrimmingTest is Test {
assertEq(expectedTrimmedSub.getDecimals(), trimmedSub.getDecimals());
}

/// forge-config: default.allow_internal_expect_revert = true
function testFuzz_SubOperatorWillOverflow(
uint8 decimals,
uint256 amtLeft,
Expand Down
Loading